欧洲央行-地理与收入：碳税的异质性效应（英）-2025
Working Paper Series Charles Labrousse, Yann Perdereau Geography versus income:
报告摘要
Working Paper Series Charles Labrousse, Yann Perdereau Geography versus income:
报告信息
- 文件全名
- 《欧洲央行-地理与收入：碳税的异质性效应（英）-2025-69页.pdf》
- 适合读者
- 核心数据
- face 20% higher welfare losses than urban households. In an optimal revenuerecycling exercise, we compare transfers targeting income and geography, and
- show that neglecting for geography reduces welfare gains by 7%. We conclude
- uniform carbon tax of e100 per ton of CO would reduce national emissions by 15% but
- impose costs averaging e600 per household per year before any revenue recycling. Rural households would face costs 20% higher than Parisian households. The more limited
- EU-ETS 2, with an expected carbon price of e45 per ton, would achieve smaller emission reductions (3%) and lower average costs (e200 per household) while maintaining
- 核心议题
常见问题
《欧洲央行-地理与收入：碳税的异质性效应（英）-2025》主要包含哪些内容?
Working Paper Series Charles Labrousse, Yann Perdereau Geography versus income:核心数据:face 20% higher welfare losses than urban households. In an optimal revenuerecycling exercise, we compare transfers targeting income and geography, and;show that neglecting for geography reduces welfare gains by 7%. We conclude;uniform carbon tax of e100 per ton of CO would reduce national emissions by 15% but。
这份报告由哪家机构发布?
本报告由欧洲央行发布,发布于 2025 年。
这份报告覆盖哪一年、篇幅多大?
覆盖 2025 年,全文约 69。
这份报告是免费的吗?如何获取?
本报告免费查阅,登录资料宝后即可在线获取完整内容。
这份报告适合哪些读者?
适合战略规划、行业研究员等读者参考。
报告涉及哪些关键议题?
重点分析了管理咨询等议题。
继续阅读
查看全部 →